วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 21 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2563

RZuckerberg: Facebook in 'arms race' against electoral interference

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has told the BBC that preventing electoral interference is an "arms race" against countries such as Russia, Iran and China.

He admitted that the firm was "behind" in the 2016 US presidential election.

In his first UK broadcast interview in five years, he said that Facebook had been unprepared for state-sponsored interference in 2016.

But he added the company was confident it had since learnt its lessons.

Facebook was previously embroiled in a political scandal in which tens of millions of its users' data ended up in the hands of political interest groups including Cambridge Analytica.

However, he said the social media giant, which also owns Whatsapp and Instagram, was now better prepared than other companies, and even governments, to prevent future attempts to influence political outcomes.

In-app shops launched on Facebook and Instagram
Canada Facebook fined $6.5m over privacy claims
Facebook to pay $52m to moderators over PTSD
"Countries are going to continue to try and interfere and we are going to see issues like that but we have learnt a lot since 2016 and I feel pretty confident that we are going to be able to protect the integrity of the upcoming election".

On the coronavirus pandemic, Mr Zuckerberg said that while Facebook had and would remove any content that would likely result in "immediate harm" to users it would not stop groups alleging that the infection was state sponsored or connected to the launch of the new digital 5G network.

Facebook took down a claim by Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro that scientists had "proved" that there was a cure for coronavirus.

"That is obviously not true and so we took it down. It doesn't matter who says it".

He also said that Facebook had removed content from groups claiming that the rollout of the 5G digital network was a cause of the spread of the virus and, in some cases, encouraged those who believed that to damage the networks' physical infrastructure.

Facebook recently removed content from former broadcaster and conspiracy theorist David Icke for "repeatedly violating our policies on harmful misinformation".

Mr Icke had had suggested that 5G mobile phone networks are linked to the spread of the virus and in another video post he suggested a Jewish group was behind the virus.

Mr Zuckerberg said: "Even if something isn't going to lead to imminent physical harm, we don't want misinformation to be the content that is going viral across the network so we work with independent fact checkers.

"Since the Covid outbreak, they have issued 7,500 notices of misinformation which has led to us issuing 50 million warning labels on posts. We know these are effective because 95% of the time, users don't click through to the content with a warning label."

However, Mr Zuckerberg insisted that unless there was the prospect of real imminent harm, then Facebook would and should allow what he called the "widest possible aperture" for freedom of expression on the internet.

Company control
Mr Zuckerberg also defended his level of personal control over arguably the world's most powerful media platforms.

Although Facebook is a public company worth nearly $700bn (£574bn), he ultimately exerts total individual control thanks to an ownership structure that gives him a controlling interest even though he owns a small fraction of the shares.

He said it had allowed Facebook to make longer-term strategic decisions which have proved to be correct such as waiting to improve the Facebook experience before launching it on smartphones and not selling out early to rivals.

"If it had been different then we would have sold out to Yahoo years ago and who knows what would have happened then. "

Yahoo is now worth 1/20th as much as Facebook.

Facebook continues to face criticism over its reluctance to describe or define itself as a publisher and thus embrace the kind of editorial responsibility that newspapers and traditional broadcasters are legally bound by.

วันพุธที่ 13 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2563





Rapper 6ix9ine has $200k charity donation rejected

Rapper 6ix9ine has had a $200,000 (£163,000) donation to a children's charity rejected.

The No Kid Hungry campaign said it has a policy of rejecting funding from donors who do not fit with its values.

The rapper, who was recently in prison for crimes he carried out as part of a violent gang before making a successful comeback, called the decision "cruel".

The Brooklyn rapper had evaded jail time on previous charges, including child sex offences in 2015.

In a now-deleted Instagram post, 6ix9ine, whose real name is Daniel Hernandez, announced he was donating $200,000 to the campaign, which seeks to solve problems of hunger and poverty in the US.

But Share Our Strength, the non-profit organisation that runs the campaign, told the BBC it had declined the controversial rapper's offer.

"We are grateful for Mr Hernandez's generous offer to donate to No Kid Hungry but we have informed his representatives that we have declined this donation," it said.

"As a child-focused campaign, it is our policy to decline funding from donors whose activities do not align with our mission and values."

The rapper responded on Instagram that he had "never seen something so cruel". He has since deleted the post.

6ix9ine has been making headlines in the last week for an explosive return to the spotlight after being released from prison early as part of a nationwide effort to stem the coronavirus outbreak in US jails.

He broke the all-time record for an Instagram live stream, with more than two million people tuning in at one point. His new track Gooba has racked up 120 million views on YouTube in just four days.

Last year, the 24-year-old pleaded guilty to a series of gang robberies and shootings.

At his 2019 trial, the rapper initially denied the charges against him but entered a plea bargain, giving evidence against other gang members in order to get a reduced sentence after potentially facing a maximum of life in prison.



วันเสาร์ที่ 9 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2563

Newcastle takeover: Moral values should prevail, Khashoggi's fiancee says


Newcastle United sat 13th in the Premier League when the season was suspended in March


Newcastle United and the Premier League must put moral values ahead of financial gains, says the fiancee of murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi.


Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund looks set to finance 80% of a £300m takeover of the club.

Khashoggi was killed in 2018 with Western intelligence agencies believing that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the murder - which he denies.

"Moral values should prevail," Hatice Cengiz told BBC 5 Live.

"My message would be to the management of Newcastle United and to the decision makers.

"We should consider ethical values, not just financial or political ones. Money cannot buy everything in the world. So the message that will be given to people like Crown Prince is extremely important.

"There should be no place in English football for those credibly accused of atrocities and murder".

The Premier League declined to comment.

Background
Khashoggi - a dissident Saudi columnist living in self-exile in the United States - had gone to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on 2 October 2018, seeking papers to marry Cengiz.

Investigators believe that as she waited outside, the 59-year-old was murdered and then dismembered. His remains have never been found.

UN Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard said there was credible evidence that Crown Prince Mohammed and other high-level Saudi officials were individually liable.

A court in Saudi Arabia last year sentenced five people to death and jailed three others over his murder, while Turkey has separately charged 20 suspects over the murder.

"We don't want this deal to go ahead," Cengiz added. "We are not just talking about the murder of a human being but the efforts to keep all hopes regarding the future, to keep human rights alive, to support justice and to start a transformation in the Middle East.

"This deal seems to be about buying something. But there is a wider picture. Saudi Arabia shows the world its face of reform. But it has another face where the reality is far from what is shown to the world. This is why we want this (deal) to be stopped and not be completed."

What do we know about the takeover?
Mike Ashley has owned Newcastle since 2007 and put the club up for sale in 2017. The proposed Saudi takeover is thought to be worth some £300 million.

But it has already caused much controversy.

The Saudi government has been accused of facilitating the theft of Premier League commercial rights, while Amnesty International has criticised the potential deal due to the country's dire human rights record.

The country has also been accused of "sportswashing", a term used to describe countries that try to improve their international reputation by investing in major teams or hosting big sporting events.

But these accusations have been rebuffed by the Saudi government, which claims it wants to get more of its people engaged in sport.



วันอังคารที่ 5 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2563

German top court criticises European Central Bank crisis bond-buying

Germany's top court has ruled that the European Central Bank's mass bond-buying to stabilise the eurozone partly violates the German constitution.

The ruling relates to government debt worth trillions of euros bought by the ECB since 2015, but not purchases in the current coronavirus crisis.

The Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe says there is not enough German political oversight in the purchases.

Germany's Bundesbank carries the most weight in the ECB's decisions.

Italy is among the countries most reliant now on ECB bond purchases because of the severe economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

The mass bond-buying was launched after the eurozone's 2010 crisis as support for the euro besides the EU's national bailouts for Greece and some other countries.

The plaintiffs include a former leader of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), Bernd Lucke. They argue that the purchases violate the EU ban on one eurozone member subsidising the debts of another.

The court ruled that the German government and parliament had failed to ensure that the ECB's purchases were "proportionate".

But the court did not find that the ECB's actions had violated the EU ban on direct budgetary support.

The court also said "this decision does not concern the current EU or ECB financial aid provided in the coronavirus crisis".

It is now up to the ECB to explain how its mass bond-buying programme is "proportionate". The Bundesbank could pull out if it is not satisfied with the ECB's explanation, which would be a big blow to the eurozone.

Read More At :: กลุ่มลับไลฟ์สด18+ ดูหนังออนไลน์ HD แทงบอลสเต็ป188BET เว็บคาร่าออนไลน์

UFAZ 875 ส ล็อตเว็บตรงแตกง่าย ถอนเร็ว ถอนไว้ ถอนระบบออโต้ ส ล็อตเว็บตรงแตกง่าย เกมพนันออนไลน์ยอดนิยม ยอดนิยมสูงที่สุดในตอนนี้เพราะเป็นเกม...